TAP: The System for Teacher and Student Advancement
  • DONATE
  • HOME  | 
  • CONTACT US  | 
  • SUBSCRIBE  | 
  • EMPLOYMENT   
  • TRAINING PORTAL
Follow us on TwitterVisit our YouTube channel
title
  • What We Do
    • The Teacher Quality Crisis
    • Our Response
    • TAP's Impact
  • TAP In Action
    • TAP Elements of Success
      • Multiple Career Paths
      • Ongoing Applied Professional Growth
      • Instructionally Focused Accountability
      • Performance-Based Compensation
    • Success Stories
    • Principals in TAP Schools
    • What People Are Saying About TAP
    • Adopting TAP
    • TAP Projects / Partnerships
    • Events
      • TSI 2013
      • TAP Conference 2013
      • TSI 2012
      • TAP Conference 2012
      • TSI 2011
      • TAP Conference 2011
      • TSI 2010
      • TAP Conference 2010
      • TAP Conference 2009
      • TAP Conference 2008
    • FAQs
  • Policy & Research
    • Research Supporting
      TAP's Elements
      • Multiple Career Paths
      • Ongoing Applied Professional Growth
      • Instructionally Focused Accountability
      • Performance-Based Compensation
      • Bibiography
    • TAP Outcomes
      • Louisiana
      • South Carolina
      • Texas
    • Legislation
    • Understanding Value-Added
    • Teacher Quality Resources
      • Teacher Compensation
      • Teacher Evaluation
      • Teacher Recruitment & Retention
      • Student Assessment
      • Federal Policy
      • Teacher Effectiveness
      • Teacher and Principal Leadership
    • The Working Group on
      Teacher Quality
  • TAP Awards
    • Lowell Milken TAP Founder's Award
      • Overview
      • About the Founder
      • Recipients
      • Photos
      • Videos
      • FAQs
    • TAP Recognition Awards
      • Overview
      • Recipients
      • Photos
      • Videos
  • About Us
    • NIET
    • About Lowell Milken
    • Our History
    • Our Team
      • NIET Staff
      • TAP Staff
    • Educator Tributes
    • TAP Supporters
  • Newsroom
    • Press Releases
    • Videos
    • TAP in the News
    • Photos
    • Performance-Pay Editorials
    • Features
    • What's on TAP
  • Publications
    • Research and Reports
    • TAP Brochures
News about the TAP System for Teacher and Student Advancement, founded by Lowell Milken
Newsroom
Press Releases Videos TAP in the News Photos Features Performance-Pay Editorials What's on TAP
Printer Friendly Version
Email



Features


[2013]  [2012]  [2011]  [2010]  [2009]  [2008]  [2007]  [2006]  [2005] 

January 20, 2012

Gates Findings Substantiate NIET’s Building Blocks for Meaningful Teacher Evaluations

NIET Statement on Gates Foundation Measures of Effective Teaching (MET) Study

On January 6, the Gates Foundation released a series of findings from a two-year study of teacher performance and evaluation. We are pleased that the six key recommendations to policymakers and practitioners affirm what we have learned from implementing TAP over the past decade in schools across the country:

  1. Choose an observation instrument that sets clear expectations.
    The TAP Teaching Standards differentiate levels of teaching practice across 19 indicators of practice. This level of detail provides teachers and evaluators with a common language to describe and discuss teaching practice.
  2. Require observers to demonstrate accuracy before they rate teacher practice.
    TAP requires that any evaluator be trained and certified before evaluating a teacher. To become certified, evaluators must observe a full lesson and score it on all 19 indicators. Their scores must come within one point of the overall score of expert national raters. In addition, evaluators must be recertified annually.
  3. When high stakes decisions are being made, multiple observations are necessary.
    TAP calls for four to six observations of full lessons for each teacher every year. Observations must be done by at least three different observers.
  4. Track system-level reliability by double scoring some teachers with impartial observers.
    TAP state directors and their staff, as well as NIET, are available to double score some teachers to check for impartiality. TAP schools also use data management tools to regularly check for consistency and accuracy across evaluators.
  5. Combine observations with student achievement gains and student feedback.
    TAP combines teacher observation with student achievement growth measured by value added both at the classroom level, where available, and schoolwide. Additionally, all TAP teachers receive feedback from an annual responsibility survey, which is completed by fellow teachers.
  6. Regularly verify that teachers with stronger observation scores also have stronger student achievement gains on average.
    TAP allows teachers and administrators to compare their observation scores with student achievement gains on an annual basis to verify the accuracy of evaluations. TAP also provides teachers with many opportunities to compare their observation scores with more informal student growth measures during the course of the year.
The experience of TAP schools across the country confirms what the Gates MET study found—good evaluation tools and quality implementation can significantly improve teacher evaluation both in terms of more accurately assessing performance and providing detailed feedback for improvement.



Resources for...
Federal Funding Opportunities
Prospective States
and Districts
Current TAP Schools
Donors
TAP Elements of Success
What People Are Saying About TAP

Kathleen Karnes, Career Teacher, Holston Middle School, Knoxville, Tennessee
"Receiving useful evaluations from the master teachers allows me to concentrate on my strengths, and to bring up my weaknesses, which benefits me and my students . . . "
Read more



TAP is managed and supported by the National Institute for Excellence in Teaching (NIET).
© 2013. All rights reserved. Meet the Founder: Lowell Milken
External sites not endorsed by the National Institute for Excellence in Teaching